Abstract
AbstractPrevious studies of entry under New York's free banking law of 1838 have generated conflicting results. This article shows that different measures of entry lead to different conclusions about the competitive effects of the law. Measured by the entry of new banks, New York's free banking law led to increased rates of entry relative to other states. Free banking did not, however, lead to significant increases in capital accumulation in the industry. This paradoxical outcome resulted from the regulatory features of free banking, especially the bond security feature, which reduced profitability and incentives to invest in banking.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Cliometrics and Antebellum Banking;Handbook of Cliometrics;2024
2. Cliometrics and Antebellum Banking;Handbook of Cliometrics;2023
3. Cliometrics and Antebellum Banking;Handbook of Cliometrics;2019
4. Cliometrics and Antebellum Banking;Handbook of Cliometrics;2019
5. Bibliographie;L’Entrepreneur et le Prince;2017-02-01