Author:
Allen William A.,Moessner Richhild
Abstract
We examine the international propagation of the financial crisis of 2008, and compare it with that of the crisis of 1931. Both crises featured a flight to liquidity and safety. We argue that the collateral squeeze in the United States, which became intense after the failure of Lehman Brothers, was an important propagator in 2008; in 1931 the acceptances granted by London banks to central European borrowers propagated the crisis to the UK. In both crises, central banks' reserve management actions contributed to the liquidity crisis. And in both crises, the behaviour of creditors towards debtors, and the valuation of assets by creditors, were very important. However, there was a key difference between the two crises in the range and nature of assets that were regarded as liquid and safe: central banks in 2008, with no gold standard constraint, could liquefy illiquid assets on a much greater scale.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference53 articles.
1. Gorton G. and Metrick A. (2009). Securitized banking and the run on repo. NBER Working Paper no. 15223.
2. Copeland A. , Martin A. and Walker M. (2010). The tri-party repo market before the 2010 reforms. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report no. 477. Available at http://data.newyorkfed.org/research/staff_reports/sr477.pdf.
3. The shadow banking system: implications for regulation;Adrian;Banque de France Financial Stability Review,2009
4. How Did the Crisis in International Funding Markets Affect Bank Lending? Balance Sheet Evidence from the United Kingdom
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献