Abstract
One of the specialist contributions often appended to an archaeological report is the analysis of human skeletal material. Such an analysis is rarely of sufficient interest to be included in the main report, largely because the excavator has not set pertinent and soluble problems for the analyst. The time of specialists has been wasted measuring morphological minutiae in a vain attempt to track down quasi-tribal entities in which archaeologists no longer believe. The assessment of the age and sex of a skeleton, however, follows a firm methodology, is far less time-consuming, and yields relevant information.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Archaeology,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,History,Archaeology,Classics
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Female biased adult sex ratio in the Bronze Age cemetery of Shahr‐i Sokhta (Iran) as an indicator of long distance trade and matrilocality;American Journal of Biological Anthropology;2024-02-13
2. The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World;2007-11-29
3. The Frontier Zones;The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World;2007-11-29
4. Roman Egypt;The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World;2007-11-29
5. The Eastern Mediterranean;The Cambridge Economic History of the Greco-Roman World;2007-11-29