Abstract
AbstractThe Ottoman Empire introduced the muhtar system in Istanbul in 1829, appointing lay headmen, called muhtar, to the lowest levels of urban administration: Muslim neighborhoods; Orthodox, Armenian, and Catholic parishes; and Jewish congregations. This reform resulted in the overlapping of state responsibilities and those of non-Muslim religious authorities, later leading to disputes between the groups. This article investigates such disagreements in an effort to understand how state officials perceived non-Muslim religious authorities’ participation in imperial governance. In so doing, this article argues that, as non-Muslim political movements began developing during the late nineteenth century, state officials adopted a cautious attitude toward non-Muslim clergy, viewing the latter as requiring more careful handling than the layman. This take on clergymen was a shift, a reconsideration of the exceptional treatment they had previously enjoyed, and ignited a growing desire to sever the ties, formerly tolerated, between muhtars and religious authorities.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development,Sociology and Political Science,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference13 articles.
1. Conceptualizing Inter-religious Relations in the Ottoman Empire: The Early Modern Centuries
2. Governing the Armenian Question through Passports in the Late Ottoman Empire (1876–1908)
3. Tanzimat Döneminde Çıkarılan Men’-i Mürûr ve Pasaport Nizâmnâmeleri;Çadırcı;Belgeler,1993
4. The Placard Affair and the Ankara Trial: The Hnchak Party and the Hamidian Regime in Central Anatolia, 1892–93;Altıntaş;Journal of the Ottoman and Turkish Studies Association,2017
5. Invisible City: Istanbul’s Migrants and the Politics of Space