Abstract
Electron back scatter diffraction (EBSD) mapping and indexing has rapidly come into widespread use. However, inadequate attention has been paid to the details of the method. Many of the algorithms in current use were chosen because they were the first ones that were found to work, rather than because they were optimum. Results of systematic study are presented. It is shown that more than one method can successfully correct a sampling artifact, that there is an optimum binning ratio, that Gaussian filtering provides an alternative to “butterfly convolution,” that better alternatives for mapping image quality than those in current use are available, and that saving all the original patterns is practical and advantageous.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference9 articles.
1. Toft, P. (1996).The Radon Transform: Theory and Implementation.PhD Thesis,Technical University of Denmark,Lyngby.Available at:http://www.adm.dtu.dk/fakta/darwin/index_e.htm
2. Thermo Noran Company .(1999).Phase ID (User Manual).
3. Sonka, M. , Hlavac, V. , & Boyle, R. (1998).Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision.2nd ed. Boston:PWS Publishing.
4. Krämer, S. & Mayer, J. (1999).Using the Hough transform for HOLZ line identification inconvergent beam electron diffraction.J Microsc 194,2–11.
5. Tao, X. & Eades, J.A. (2002).Alternatives to image quality mapping in EBSD, microscopy andmicroanalysis.Microsc Microanal 8(Suppl. 2),692CD.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献