Abstract
There is a long tradition in economics of evaluating social arrangements by the extent to which individuals' preferences are satisfied. This is the tradition of welfarism, which has developed from nineteenth-century utilitarianism. Increasingly, however, the presumption that preference-satisfaction is the appropriate standard for evaluating social arrangements is being challenged by an alternative view: that we should focus on the set of opportunities open to each individual.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy
Reference40 articles.
1. Against the taste model
2. A comparison of different rankings of opportunity sets;Klemisch-Ahlert;Social Choice and Welfare,1993
Cited by
141 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Normative and behavioural economics: a historical and methodological review;The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought;2024-04-15
2. References;A Primer on Critical Thinking and Business Ethics;2024-03-04
3. Measurement;Freedom as Non-Constraint;2024
4. Human and Natural Constraints;Freedom as Non-Constraint;2024
5. Adaptive preferences, self-expression and preference-based freedom rankings;Economics and Philosophy;2023-09-26