Abstract
Discussions of Karl Popper's falsificationist philosophy of science appear regularly in the recent literature on economic methodology. In this literature, there seem to be two fundamental points of agreement about Popper. First, most economists take Popper's falsificationist method of bold conjecture and severe test to be the correct characterization of scientific conduct in the physical sciences. Second, most economists admit that economic theory fails miserably when judged by these same falsificationist standards. As Latsis (1976, p. 8) states, “the development of economic analysis would look a dismal affair through falsificationist spectacles.”
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy
Reference51 articles.
1. The Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis: Reply;Boland;American Economic Review,1983
2. On the Futility of Criticizing the Neoclassical Maximization Hypothesis;Boland;American Economic Review,1981
Cited by
40 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献