Abstract
One of the most serious pre-occupations of post-medieval philosophy has been to distinguish those kinds of assertion which are either true or false from those which are neither true nor false. A solution to this problem would be of the highest importance. It would indicate in what areas rational inquiry has some hope of success and in what areas it is doomed to frustration. It would tell us, for example, whether it is worth trying to think about the possible mistakenness of our moral principles, or whether such thinking is bound to be ineffective since no truth or falsity attaches to them.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference2 articles.
1. Studies in the Logic of Confirmation;Hempel;Mind,1945
2. Degree of Confirmation;The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,1954
Cited by
36 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Karl Bühler’s Research Program and its Heuristics;Revista de Historia de la Psicología;2023
2. Hempel and confirmation theory;The Routledge Handbook of Logical Empiricism;2021-11-23
3. Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations;Synthese Library;2018
4. Frege;Synthese Library;2018
5. Philosophy and science in Adam Smith’s ‘History of Astronomy’;History of the Human Sciences;2017-07