Abstract
Moral sceptics maintain that there are no objective moral values, or that there is no moral knowledge, or no moral facts, or that what looks like a statement which makes a moral judgment is not really a statement and does not have a truth-value. All of this is rather, unclear because all of it is negative. It will be necessary to remove some of this unclarity because my aim in this paper is to establish a proposition which may be summarized by saying: even if there are no objective moral values in one sense, there are objective moralvalues in another sense, and the latter values are good enough to do some of the jobs that objective values in the first sense would have done. A useful analogy might be that of a person who has lost her hand and has been given a prosthesis. In one sense the prosthesis is not as real (because man-made) as the hand, in another sense it is just as real (both are physical objects); most importantly, the person can do with the prosthesis enough of what she could do with the hand to make do.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Where Objective Facts and Norms Meet (and What this Means for Law);International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique;2022-06-08
2. Answering Pilate: Options for Interpreting Religious Truth;Sophia;2021-01-18
3. Justificación Y Noción De Verdad;European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy;2019-12-25
4. Giambattista Vico on Natural Law;2019-03-20
5. The Necessity of Value Pluralism in Administrative Practice;Administration & Society;2014-09-24