Abstract
The word ought is often used to express moral judgments. It is used to express moral laws, as in “We ought to honour our parents”; and it is used to express singular moral judgments, as in “You ought not to have spoken to your mother like that”". Some singular moral judgments are clearly deductions from some moral law, as is “You ought not to have spoken to your mother like that”. Others, however, are not clearly so, e.g. “You ought not to have done that”. Where both the agent and the action are indicated merely by a contextual reference, no underlying moral law is suggested by the words alone. Even when the singular judgment characterizes both the agent and the action, as “You, being a strong man, ought to have gone to his aid”, it may still be quite obscure what, if any, moral law implies this judgment. Clearly there is no moral law that “Every strong man ought always to go to everybody's aid”.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. “Ought implies can” & missed care;Nursing Philosophy;2019-07-15
2. The Culpable Inability Problem for Synchronic and Diachronic ‘Ought Implies Can’;Journal of Moral Philosophy;2019-02-27
3. Deontic Logic;Introduction to Formal Philosophy;2018
4. Formalization;Introduction to Formal Philosophy;2018
5. ‘Ought Implies Can’: Not So Pragmatic After All;Philosophy and Phenomenological Research;2017-09-11