Abstract
AbstractScientific realism holds that the terms in our scientific theories refer and that we should believe in their existence. This presupposes a certain understanding of quantification, namely that it is ontologically committing, which I challenge in this paper. I argue that the ontological loading of the quantifiers is smuggled in through restricting the domains of quantification, without which it is clear to see that quantifiers are ontologically neutral. Once we remove domain restrictions, domains of quantification can include non-existent things, as they do in scientific theorizing. Scientific realism would therefore require redefining without presupposing a view of ontologically committing quantification.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Methodology for the metaphysics of pregnancy;European Journal for Philosophy of Science;2021-07-16
2. A puzzle about Moorean metaphysics;Philosophical Studies;2020-03-14
3. The logic behind Quine's criterion of ontological commitment;European Journal of Philosophy;2020-03-09
4. Quantifier Variance Dissolved;Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement;2018-07