Abstract
This paper is divided into three sections. The first presents some examples of the killing/letting die distinction. The second draws a further distinction between what I call negative and positive cases of acting or refraining. Here I argue that the moral significance of the acting/refraining distinction is different for positive and for negative cases. In the third section I apply the above distinction to euthanasia, and argue that mercy killing should be regarded as analogous to positive rather than negative cases. On the basis of this, I then support active rather than passive euthanasia.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference6 articles.
1. Rachels , op. cit., 80).
2. On killing and letting die
3. Rachels , op. cit., 79.
4. Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem
5. Criminal Attempt and the Theory of the Law of Crimes;Becker;Philosophy and Public Affairs,1974
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献