Abstract
AbstractBy making use of Aurel Kolnai's ethical writings I want to offer a more adequate understanding of moral conflicts and moral dilemmas. Insisting on Kolnai's phenomenological method, in particular, focussing on the agent's moral awareness (or conscience) and his deliberation, results in an understanding of moral conflicts as moments of moral choice rather than anomalies of moral theory. In this way, I argue that one can account for Bernard Williams's phenomenological description of moral conflicts without having to accept his anti-realist conclusions. Moreover, this approach indicates the adequacy of ordinary moral reasoning for decision-making and action guidance. Lastly and importantly, the essay illustrates the relevance of Kolnai's writings to contemporary moral philosophy.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Rationality is Not Coherence;The Philosophical Quarterly;2022-12-23
2. Conflicting Judgments and Weakness of Will;Philosophia;2020-08-25
3. The viability of Kolnai’s moral phenomenology;Aurel Kolnai’s The War Against the West Reconsidered;2019-02-13
4. A Short Introduction to Aurel Kolnai’s Moral Philosophy;Journal of Philosophical Research;2013
5. Universalizability in Moral Judgments;International Philosophical Quarterly;2012