Author:
BOSETTI VALENTINA,LUBOWSKI RUBEN,GOLUB ALEXANDER,MARKANDYA ANIL
Abstract
ABSTRACTThis study uses a global climate-energy-economy model to investigate potential implications of linking credits from reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries to a global carbon market, focusing on reducing emissions from deforestation (RED) and effects on energy technology innovation. Integrating RED into a global carbon market lowers the estimated total costs of a policy to achieve 535 ppmv of CO2-equivalent concentrations in 2100 by up to 25 per cent. Alternatively, a global RED program could enable additional reductions of about 20 ppmv by 2100 with no added costs compared with an energy-sector-only policy. The results indicate that market linkage of RED induces modest reductions in clean energy innovation overall but slightly enhances development of particular technologies, including carbon capture and storage. We also find that RED in combination with credit banking encourages greater mitigation in the near term, enhancing flexibility to potentially tighten emission targets at lower cost in response to future information.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Environmental Science,Development
Reference48 articles.
1. Paltsev S. , Reilly J.M. , Jacoby H.D. , Gurgel A. , Metcalf G.E. , Sokolov A.P. , and Holak J.F. (2007), ‘Assessments of US cap-and-trade proposals’, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Report No. 146, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
2. US Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) (2009), ‘Key findings from the economic analysis of the USCAP Blueprint for Legislative Action’, United States Climate Action Partnership, Washington, DC.
3. Comparing climate and cost impacts of reference levels for reducing emissions from deforestation
4. Implications of Limiting CO
2
Concentrations for Land Use and Energy
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献