Abstract
Abstract
Nigeria is endowed with abundant sunshine year-round; thus, solar PV would solve the environmental problems associated with petrol-powered generators. However, it is unclear whether households are willing to transition. Thus, we analyze households’ willingness to pay (WTP) for solar PV under four scenarios: (i) WTP when a solar PV is complemented with a generator, (ii) WTP when a solar PV completely displaces a generator, (iii) WTP when a solar PV is complemented with a generator, plus a subsidy, and (iv) WTP when a solar PV completely displaces a generator, given a subsidy. We find that WTP for solar PV is higher when it can displace generators completely. Subsidy plus monthly rather than upfront payment would scale up the adoption of solar PV by about 6 per cent. Furthermore, the cost benefit analysis results show that solar PV investment is profitable. Thus, there is a need to implement policies aimed at scaling up the energy transition.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Environmental Science,Development
Reference70 articles.
1. IPCC (2021) Summary for Policymakers. In Masson-Delmotte V et al. (eds), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.
2. How to get rural households out of energy poverty in Nigeria: a contingent valuation;Nduka;Energy Policy,2021
3. Renewable energy, poverty alleviation and developing nations: evidence from Senegal;Thiam;Journal of Energy in Southern Africa,2011
4. Determinants of household adoption of solar energy technology in rural Ethiopia;Guta;Journal of Cleaner Production,2018
5. Exeter Community Energy (2020) Making energy work for everyone. Available at https://www.ecoe.org.uk/about/.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献