Author:
Arrow Kenneth J.,Dasgupta Partha,Goulder Lawrence H.,Mumford Kevin J.,Oleson Kirsten
Abstract
AbstractWe develop and apply a consistent and comprehensive theoretical framework for assessing whether economic growth is compatible with sustaining wellbeing over time. Our approach differs from earlier approaches by concentrating on wealth rather than income. Sustainability is demonstrated by showing that a properly defined comprehensive measure of wealth is maintained through time. Our wealth measure is unusually comprehensive, capturing not only reproducible and human capital but also natural capital, health improvements and technological change. We apply the framework to five countries: the United States, China, Brazil, India and Venezuela. We show that the often-neglected contributors to wealth – technological change, natural capital and health capital – fundamentally affect the conclusions one draws about whether given nations are achieving sustainability. Indeed, even countries that display sustainability differ considerably in the kinds of capital that contribute to it.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,General Environmental Science,Development
Reference34 articles.
1. Pezzey J. (1992), ‘Sustainable development concepts: an economic analysis’, World Bank Environment Paper No. 2, World Bank: Washington, DC.
2. Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of “weak” sustainability
Cited by
464 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献