Author:
Belikova Alyona,White Lydia
Abstract
This article examines how changes in linguistic theory affect the debate between the fundamental difference hypothesis and the access-to-Universal Grammar (UG) approach to SLA. With a focus on subjacency (Chomsky, 1973), a principle of UG that places constraints on wh-movement and that has frequently been taken as a test case for verifying second language (L2) access to UG, we reanalyze earlier L2 findings in terms of a revised constraint, which effectively prohibits extraction out of subjects and adjuncts. We show that L2 learners indeed observe such a constraint on wh-movement, and, at the same time, we suggest that recent claims for a universal computational system (e.g., Chomsky, 1995; Uriagereka, 1999) make the respective roles of the first language and UG difficult to tease apart.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics,Education
Reference61 articles.
1. Stowell T . (1981). Origins of phrase structure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
2. On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition;Schachter;Second Language Research,1990
3. Order in Phrase Structure and Movement
4. Ross J. R . (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献