RACE, JUSTICE, AND DESEGREGATION1
-
Published:2014
Issue:1
Volume:11
Page:87-108
-
ISSN:1742-058X
-
Container-title:Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Du Bois Rev.
Author:
Darby Derrick,Saatcioglu Argun
Abstract
AbstractIn this essay we argue that the ideology of colorblind justice has made resisting the retreat from public school desegregation a hard sell in postracial America. We do not believe that desegregation is the silver bullet for solving all the problems with public education. Nor do we believe that it alone can close the racial achievement gap. Yet there is convincing evidence regarding the potential benefits of desegregation and evidence on its negative consequences is weak. Therefore we believe that it is a policy still worth pursuing. Our hope is that by casting light on the anatomy of colorblind justice and its limits we can contribute to ongoing efforts to ensure that desegregation remains in the conversation about how to address the unfinished business of racial justice.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Anthropology,Cultural Studies
Reference122 articles.
1. Board of Education of Oklahoma v. Dowell (1991). 498 U.S. 237.
2. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954). 347 U.S. 483.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. References;Racism Postrace;2019
2. Incantation;Racism Postrace;2019
3. Veiled Visibility;Racism Postrace;2019
4. “Haute [Ghetto] Mess”;Racism Postrace;2019
5. Debt by Design;Racism Postrace;2019