Author:
Gough Mark D.,Taylor Poppe Emily S.
Abstract
There is widespread concern among scholars, court actors, and policy makers that the number of pro se litigants is increasing. However, we have little empirical evidence of the scope of pro se litigation, especially in the federal court system. Using data from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on all civil case filings since 1999, we investigate the prevalence and rate of pro se litigation in federal district courts. We find no evidence of a dramatic rise in pro se litigation, but we document substantial variation in rates of pro se litigation by type of case and circuit of filing. The results have implications for our understanding of self-representation and for the development of policies addressing access to civil justice.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Social Sciences
Reference89 articles.
1. Undue Hardship in the Bankruptcy Courts: An Empirical Assessment of the Discharge of Education Debt.;Pardo;University of Cincinnati Law Review,2005
2. National Center for Access to Justice. “Justice Index 2016.” 2016. http://justiceindex.org/2016-findings/.
3. Networking in the Shadow of the Law: Informal Access to Legal Expertise through Personal Network Ties
4. The Importance of Litigant Wealth.;Yoon;DePaul Law Review,2009
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献