(Un)Changing Rates of Pro Se Litigation in Federal Court

Author:

Gough Mark D.,Taylor Poppe Emily S.

Abstract

There is widespread concern among scholars, court actors, and policy makers that the number of pro se litigants is increasing. However, we have little empirical evidence of the scope of pro se litigation, especially in the federal court system. Using data from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts on all civil case filings since 1999, we investigate the prevalence and rate of pro se litigation in federal district courts. We find no evidence of a dramatic rise in pro se litigation, but we document substantial variation in rates of pro se litigation by type of case and circuit of filing. The results have implications for our understanding of self-representation and for the development of policies addressing access to civil justice.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,General Social Sciences

Reference89 articles.

1. Undue Hardship in the Bankruptcy Courts: An Empirical Assessment of the Discharge of Education Debt.;Pardo;University of Cincinnati Law Review,2005

2. National Center for Access to Justice. “Justice Index 2016.” 2016. http://justiceindex.org/2016-findings/.

3. Networking in the Shadow of the Law: Informal Access to Legal Expertise through Personal Network Ties

4. The Importance of Litigant Wealth.;Yoon;DePaul Law Review,2009

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The impact of legal representation in Israeli traffic courts: Addressing selection bias and generalizability problems;Journal of Empirical Legal Studies;2024-07

2. RePresent: Enabling Access to Justice for Pro Se Litigants via Co-Authored Serious Games;Designing Interactive Systems Conference;2024-07

3. Mandatory Employment Arbitration;Annual Review of Law and Social Science;2023-10-13

4. Courts as Data Guardians for the Public Good;University of Toronto Law Journal;2023-08-01

5. Impact of Machine Learning in Legal Education and the Legal Profession;Technology Management and Its Social Impact on Education;2023-06-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3