Abstract
Legal constitutionalism – Political constitutionalism – Emergence of illiberal constitutionalism as a tertium genus – Examination of constitutional courts under three illiberal governments: Poland, Hungary, and Turkey – Illiberal governments’ strategies to seize control of constitutional courts – Illiberal governments’ aim to secure leverage over constitutional judges and restrict the powers of review of the court – Constitutional courts under illiberal rule invert the traditional functions that were assigned to them under the original Kelsenian approach – Instead of a check on power, illiberal constitutional courts become a device to circumvent constitutional constraints and concentrate power in the hands of the ruling actors.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference39 articles.
1. Political Constitutionalism
2. Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union
3. Firing Bench-mates: The Human Rights and Rule of Law Implications of the Turkish Constitutional Court’s Dismissal of Its Two Members. Decision of 4 August 2016, E.2016/6 (Miscellaneous file), K.2016/12;Olcay;EuConst,2017
4. Constitutionalism and Dictatorship
5. Abusive Constitutionalism;Landau;UC Davies Law Review,2013
Cited by
65 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Conclusion;Politicizing Political Liberalism;2024-08-20
2. Municipalities and Their Role in Containment;Politicizing Political Liberalism;2024-08-20
3. The Duty to Transform Public Reason;Politicizing Political Liberalism;2024-08-20
4. The Duty of Pressure;Politicizing Political Liberalism;2024-08-20
5. Can We Really Ask the Oppressed to Be Reasonable? Serious Injustice, Civility, and Over-Demandingness;Politicizing Political Liberalism;2024-08-20