Author:
BECHER VERÓNICA,GRIGORIEFF SERGE
Abstract
What parts of the classical descriptive set theory done in Polish spaces still hold for more general topological spaces, possibly T0 or T1, but not T2 (i.e. not Hausdorff)? This question has been addressed by Selivanov in a series of papers centred on algebraic domains. And recently it has been considered by de Brecht for quasi-Polish spaces, a framework that contains both countably based continuous domains and Polish spaces. In this paper, we present alternative unifying topological spaces, that we call approximation spaces. They are exactly the spaces for which player Nonempty has a stationary strategy in the Choquet game. A natural proper subclass of approximation spaces coincides with the class of quasi-Polish spaces. We study the Borel and Hausdorff difference hierarchies in approximation spaces, revisiting the work done for the other topological spaces. We also consider the problem of effectivization of these results.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Computer Science Applications,Mathematics (miscellaneous)
Reference30 articles.
1. Stratégies gagnantes dans certains jeux topologiques;Debs;Fundamenta Mathematicae,1985
2. Wadge reducibility and Hausdorff difference hierarchy in Pω
3. Marker D. (2002) Descriptive Set Theory. Lecture Notes. On Marker's home page. Available at http://homepages.math.uic.edu/~marker/math512/dst.ps.
4. Debs G. (1984) An example of an α-favourable topological space with no α-winning tactic. Séminaire d'Initiation a l'Analyse (Choquet-Rogalski-Saint Raymond).
5. On a hierarchy of sets II;Ershov;Algebra and Logic,1968
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献