The semantic content of concrete, abstract, specific, and generic concepts
-
Published:2024-01-18
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1-28
-
ISSN:1866-9808
-
Container-title:Language and Cognition
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Lang. cogn.
Author:
Villani CaterinaORCID,
Loia Adele,
Bolognesi Marianna M.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Abstraction processes involve two variables that are often confused with one another: concreteness (banana versus belief) and specificity (chair versus furniture or Buddhism versus religion). Researchers are investigating the relationship between them, but many questions remain open, such as: What type of semantics characterizes words with varying degrees of concreteness and specificity? We tackle this topic through an in-depth semantic analysis of 1049 Italian words for which human-generated concreteness and specificity ratings are available. Our findings show that (as expected) the semantics of concrete and abstract concepts differs, but most interestingly when specificity is considered, the variance in concreteness ratings explained by semantic types increases substantially, suggesting the need to carefully control word specificity in future research. For instance, mathematical concepts (phase) are on average abstract and generic, while behavioral qualities (arrogant) are on average abstract but specific. Moreover, through cluster analyses based on concreteness and specificity ratings, we observe the bottom-up emergence of four subgroups of semantically coherent words. Overall, this study provides empirical evidence and theoretical insight into the interplay of concreteness and specificity in shaping semantic categorization.
Funder
European Research Council
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Language and Linguistics
Reference73 articles.
1. L’Embodied Cognition e la sfida dei concetti astratti. Un approccio multidimensionale;Villani;Rivista internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia,2018
2. Is time an embodied property of concepts?
3. Afbeeldbaarheidsnormen van 1087 Nederlandse woorden [Imageability norms for 1,087 Dutch words];Van Loon-Vervoorn;Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden,1984