Abstract
The 1965 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was one of the most significant legislative accomplishments in twentieth-century American politics. To date, legislative histories have usually argued that the ESEA's passage was the result of either auspicious political circumstances or the political skill of the Johnson White House. Complicating these histories, I argue here that the ESEA was the result of skillful entrepreneurship on the part of policymakers in the White House and in Congress, and that while some auspicious political circumstances existed, these had less to do with the 1964 landslide election and more to do with subtler changes in congressional rules and commitment assignments that had taken place over the previous decade. I illustrate how ESEA supporters collectively overcame daunting legislative roadblocks, including a fractious House of Representatives and the “Three Rs.” I conclude by reflecting on the relevance of the 1965 debates for today's education policy environment.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Dreaming beyond education policy: a BlackCrit analysis of ESEA and ESSA;Journal for Multicultural Education;2023-09-05
2. Establishing the Need for Higher Education Legislation, 1945 to 1965;Power, Discourse, and the Purpose of Policy in Higher Education;2023
3. Outdoor Education;Sustainable Development Goals Series;2022-09-30
4. Early Reading Instruction: Politics and Myths About Materials and Methods;How Education Policy Shapes Literacy Instruction;2022
5. The Legal Opening Wedge to Title IX: EO 11246-11375;We Too! Gender Equity in Education and the Road to Title IX;2022