Abstract
Over the last decade, organized criminal violence has reached unprecedented levels and has caused as much violent death globally as direct armed conflict. Nonetheless, the study of organized crime in political science remains limited because these organizations and their violence are not viewed as political. Building on recent innovations in the study of armed conflict, I argue that organized criminal violence should no longer be segregated from related forms of organized violence and incorporated within the political violence literature. While criminal organizations do not seek to replace or break away from the state, they have increasingly engaged in the politics of the state through the accumulation of the means of violence itself. Like other non-state armed groups, they have developed variously collaborative and competitive relationships with the state that have produced heightened levels of violence in many contexts and allowed these organizations to gather significant political authority. I propose a simple conceptual typology for incorporating the study of these organizations into the political violence literature and suggest several areas of future inquiry that will illuminate the relationship between violence and politics more generally.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference167 articles.
1. The Ontology of “Political Violence”: Action and Identity in Civil Wars
2. Violence and Urban Order in Nairobi, Kenya and Lagos, Nigeria
3. Hiding violence to deal with the state
4. “Violence Research in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Literature Review.”;Imbusch;International Journal of Conflict and Violence,2011
5. Savell Stephanie . 2014. “Pacifying Rio’s Favelas: Innovation, Adaptation, or Continuity?” Anthropoliteia, May 16. https://anthropoliteia.net/2014/05/16/pacifying-rios-favelas-innovation-adaptation-or-continuity/, accessed June 1, 2014.
Cited by
162 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献