Abstract
In political scientists’ drive to examine causal mechanisms, qualitative expert interviews have an important role to play. This is particularly true for the analysis of complex decision-making processes, where there is a dearth of data, and for linking macro and micro levels of analysis. The paper offers suggestions for making the most effective and reflective use of qualitative expert interviews. It advocates an encompassing, knowledge-based understanding of experts and argues for the incorporation of both “inside” and “outside” experts, meaning those that make and those that analyze political decisions, into an integrated analytical framework. It puts forward concrete advice addressing this technique’s inherent challenges of selecting experts, experts’ personal biases, and the systematic capturing of evidence. Finally, the article suggests that the combination of expert interviews, experimental methods, and online interviewing can meaningfully strengthen the evidentiary value of this important data collection technique.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference75 articles.
1. Transparency and Integrity in Conducting Field Research on Politics in Challenging Contexts
2. Anderl, Felix . 2015. “Review: Bennett, Andrew & Checkel, Jeffrey T. (Eds.) (2015). Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 16(3). Retrieved September 25, 2019 (http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2456).
3. Validity and Reliability Issues In Elite Interviewing
4. The Qualitative Transparency Deliberations: Insights and Implications
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献