Abstract
Long a staple in the toolkit of American politics, comparison among subnational territorial units has gained increasing currency in comparative politics. A growing portion of subnational research, especially in the monographic literature, employs comparisons of subnational territorial units within different countries. This approach to comparison, which I term transnational comparison, has the potential to build on and extend the advantages of subnational comparison. Despite the numerous added challenges it poses, transnational comparison offers a variety of ways to incorporate and leverage variations between countries as well as within them. Drawing on exemplary studies from the literature on subnational regimes and beyond, I outline a typology of successful transnational comparative strategies. The choice among these strategies depends on their distinctive properties, on the substantive questions asked, and on the stage of a research program. All have contributed to advancing the study of politics beyond nation-centered comparison.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Cited by
37 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. An Indicator-Based Approach to Comparative Policy Analysis: Measuring Regional Governance of Migrant Integration;Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice;2024-08-13
2. TRANSFORMATIONS IN GOVERNANCE;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04
3. Conclusion;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04
4. National Consequences;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04
5. Regional Consequences;Shared Rule in Federal Theory and Practice;2024-07-04