Abstract
From 1965 to 2020, the National Science Foundation constituted the single largest funding source for political science research. As such, the NSF played a central role in defining the cutting-edge of our discipline. This study draws on historical records of the American Political Science Association to examine the political and administrative contexts that shaped the funding priorities of the NSF Political Science Program. Additionally, the study presents a new dataset and analysis of the nearly three thousand projects funded over the 55-year life of the program. The dataset shows that NSF funding was principally channeled toward quantitative research, whereas qualitative methods received little support, and work advancing normative, critical, or interpretive approaches received virtually no support. The archival record and awards-level data make visible the material forces that shaped knowledge production, and they underline the NSF’s instrumental role in consolidating behavioralism and marginalizing non-positivist approaches. The study sheds new light on the history of the discipline and helps to contextualize some of the distinctive features of American political science.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference37 articles.
1. National Science Foundation (NSF). 2002. “The Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models (EITM).” Workshop Report of the Political Science Program, Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences, National Science Foundation.
2. The State in Political Science: How We Became What We Study
3. The Behavioral Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest
4. Is Political Science Alive and Well and Living at NSF: Reflections of a Program Director at Midstream
5. The National Science Foundation and the Social Sciences;Riecken;Items,1983