Abstract
The American Political Science Association recently cautioned against the use of misinformation (giving research participants false information about the state of the world) in research with human subjects. This recommendation signals a growing recognition, as experimental research itself grows in prevalence in political science, that deceptive practices pose ethical problems. But what is wrong with misinformation in particular? I argue that while this question certainly has an ethical dimension, misinformation is bad for inference too. Misinformation moves us away from answering questions about the political world effectively. I propose a straightforward, intuitive solution to this twofold problem: tell the truth.
Funder
H2020 European Research Council
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Reference65 articles.
1. Transformative Treatments
2. What's so bad about misinformation?
3. Research Exceptionalism
4. Humphreys, Macartan . 2011. “Ethical Challenges of Embedded Experimentation.” (; http://www.columbia.edu/~mh2245/papers1/20110912Ethics.pdf)
5. TRENDS: Toward a Separate Ethics of Political Field Experiments