Abstract
AbstractThis article uses a comparison with Ukraine to investigate why protests against Lukashenka in 2020 failed to oust the Belarusian dictator. First, in contrast to his counterparts in Ukraine, Lukashenka successfully built new authoritarian economic and coercive institutions in the 1990s that raised the costs of opposition activity and reduced challengers’ access to business support. Second, Belarus has lacked a strong national identity that was critical to opposition success in Ukraine. In Ukraine, relatively powerful anti-Russian nationalism repeatedly motivated a core group of anti-incumbent activists and facilitated the opposition’s control over local power structures that supported protest activities at critical moments. In Belarus, weak national identity and consequent dearth of committed activists in national government institutions in the 1990s hampered efforts to challenge Lukashenka’s consolidation of authoritarian power. In addition, weaker national identity undermined the capacity of opposition forces to control local power structures that might have aided opposition protest.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,History,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference123 articles.
1. Narodnaia Hazeta. 1994. November 29.
2. How Feminist is the Belarusian Revolution? Female Agency and Participation in the 2020 Post-Election Protests
3. RFE/RL (Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty). 2020a. “Lukashenka Accuses Moscow of Pressuring Belarus into Russian Merger.” January 25. www.rferl.org/a/lukashenka-belarus-accuses-russia-pressuring-merger/30396235.html.
4. Belsat. 2021b. “Nasha Niva: Green Owner to Pay $5 Mln to Get Out of Jail,” July 3. https://belsat.eu/en/news/07-03-2021-nasha-niva-green-owner-to-pay-5-mln-to-get-out-of-jail/. (Accessed April 7, 2023.)
5. US Embassy Cable. 2006a. “Minsk Regime Nationalizing and Milking Economy.” May 5.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献