Abstract
AbstractPrompted by both promises and pitfalls in Michael's Zürn's A Theory of Global Governance, this paper reflects on challenges going forward beyond liberal institutionalism in the study of world politics. Six suggestions are particularly highlighted for future theorizing of global governance: (a) further distance from state-centrism; (b) greater attention to transscalar qualities of global governing; (c) more incorporation of social-structural aspects of global regulation; (d) trilateral integration of individual, institutional, and structural sources of legitimacy in global governance; (e) more synthesis of positive and normative analysis; and (f) transcendence of Euro-centrism. Together these six shifts would generate a transformed global governance theory – and possibly practice as well.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Philosophy
Reference38 articles.
1. Sources of Legitimacy in Global Governance
2. Halapua, Sitiveni , and Halapua, Peau . 2010. “Global Democracy as Talanoa: A Pacific Perspective.” Unpublished paper for the Building Global Democracy Program.
3. The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献