Abstract
This paper analyzes the idea of ‘ontological security’ to make three arguments: (a) that to be secure in one's being is paradoxical in the sense thatto be is to survive while always becoming otherwise, (b) thatto survive is to be anxious, and (c) that to get attached to such a security of one's always becoming otherwise is to engage inperformative leaps of faithin the security of one's existence. This framework is used to suggest a new interpretation of the security dilemma.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations,Philosophy
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献