Rear Visibility and Some Unresolved Problems for Economic Analysis (With Notes on Experience Goods)

Author:

Sunstein Cass R.

Abstract

AbstractIn 2014, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration finalized its rear visibility regulation, which requires cameras in all new vehicles, with the goal of allowing drivers to see what is behind them and thus reducing backover accidents. In 2018, the Trump administration embraced the regulation. The rear visibility rule raises numerous puzzles. First, Congress’ grant of authority was essentially standardless – perhaps the most open-ended in all of federal regulatory law. Second, it is not easy to identify a market failure to justify the regulation. Third, the monetized costs of the regulation greatly exceeded the monetized benefits, and yet on welfare grounds, the regulation can plausibly be counted as a significant success. Rearview cameras produce a set of benefits that are hard to quantify, including increased ease of driving, and those benefits might have been made a part of “breakeven analysis,” accompanying standard cost-benefit analysis. In addition, rearview cameras significantly improve the experience of driving, and it is plausible to think that in deciding whether to demand them, many vehicle purchasers did not sufficiently anticipate that improvement. This is a problem of limited foresight; rearview cameras are “experience goods.” A survey conducted in 2019 strongly supports this proposition, finding that about 56 % of consumers would demand at least $300 to buy a car without a rearview camera, and that fewer than 6 % would demand $50 or less. Almost all of that 6 % consists of people who do not own a car with a rearview camera. (The per-person cost is usually under $50.) These conclusions have general implications for other domains in which regulation has the potential to improve social welfare, even if it fails standard cost-benefit analysis; the defining category involves situations in which people lack experience with a good whose provision might have highly beneficial welfare effects.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Sociology and Political Science

Reference53 articles.

1. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. 2014. Rear Visibility, 79 Fed. Reg. 19,178.

2. Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007. 2008. 49 U.S.C. 30111.

3. Whitman v. American Trucking Association, 531 U.S. 457 (2001).

4. Michigan v. EPA, 135 S. Ct. 2699 (2015).

5. Business Roundtable v. SEC, 647 F3d 1144 (DC Cir. 2011).

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Increasing the use of telemedicine: A field experiment;PNAS Nexus;2024-06-14

2. A Tale of the Tails: The Value of a Statistical Life at the Tails of the Age Distribution;SSRN Electronic Journal;2024

3. Impatient Consumers;Social Research: An International Quarterly;2023-09

4. Surround-View Fisheye Camera Perception for Automated Driving: Overview, Survey & Challenges;IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems;2023-04

5. Bounded Rationality;2022-07-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3