Abstract
The law of least effort is of course constantly at play in language use. Redundant linguistic items are consistently reduced in size, replaced with a proform or simply left out. These phenomena are dealt with within the framework of a transformational-generative grammar through transformations involving reduction and deletion. In other grammars they may be handled differently; for example the ‘reduced’ sentences may be regarded as full sentences that may optionally be ‘completed’. But I am not concerned here to give a precise specification of the rules involved, but only to raise the more fundamental questions: what is the nature of the processes involved? And, under what conditions do they operate? In this discussion I shall use the term DELETION throughout although a more neutral term like OMISSION, or even NON-INCLUSION, might be preferred.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Language and Linguistics
Reference30 articles.
1. Rewrite rules and transformations;Allerton;Proceedings of the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne Philosophical Society,1970
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. The root of all gluttony;Indogermanische Forschungen;2022-10-01
2. English verbs can omit their objects when they describe routines;English Language and Linguistics;2021-07-22
3. Definite referential null objects in Old Hittite;Indogermanische Forschungen;2019-09-18
4. Situating Valency Theory in functional-cognitive space;Review of Cognitive Linguistics;2018-11-05
5. Ellipsis and Ideology;Thinking: The Second International Conference;2018-10-24