Abstract
One of the more welcome developments in generative phonology has been the acceptance of the long-established and well-known concept that the morphophonemic structure of a language may be reorganized in an attempt to establish ‘paradigmatic coherence’, that is to say, a major rôle of analogy is to eliminate or minimize allomorphic variation within a paradigm. Of course it would be wrong to suppose that analogical change is restricted to the elimination of allomorphy; indeed, it is even possible to find examples of analogical change which increase allomorphy, as in the development of the plural imperative form onto:n of Greek einai ‘to be’ in place of the more regular esto:n.1 But, since analogical elimination of allomorphy plays such a crucial rôle in linguistic change, we may safely concentrate on that aspect of analogy in this paper without denying the many other types of change in which analogy plays a part.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Language and Linguistics
Reference51 articles.
1. The phonology of Old English inflections;Kiparsky;LIn,1976
2. King R. D. (1968). Historical linguistics and generative grammar. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Changes in progress in late Northumbrian: the extension of -s as genitive and plural marker;English Language and Linguistics;2022-03-21
2. A Comparative Grammar of the Early Germanic Languages;Studies in Germanic Linguistics;2018-08-10
3. References;A Grammar of Old English;2011-04-20
4. References;A Grammar of Old English;2011-04-20
5. The Cambridge History of the English Language;The Cambridge History of the English Language;1992-07-31