“Ethnographies”: American Culture Studies and Postmodern Anthropology

Author:

Lenz Guenter H.

Abstract

When henry nash smith defined American Studies in 1957 as “the study of American culture past and present, as a whole,” he summarized more than two decades of a wide-ranging and self-consciouscriticalanalysis of culture in the United States and, at the same time, initiated the search for theunifiedor holistic “method” through which American Studies would, finally, achieve maturity as an (interdisciplinary) discipline. The 1930s were the decade when, as Warren Susman pointed out years ago, the complexity of American culture as well as the culture concept were discovered and discussed in the wider public. We think of the work of cultural anthropology, of the studies in cultural relativism by Margaret Mead or of patterns of culture by Ruth Benedict that emphasized the unity of cultures and often were written with a self-critical look at American culture in mind. What was, however, even more important was the fact that during the 1930s American culture manifested itself as amulticulture, as a culture that was characterized even more by variety, heterogeneity, tensions, and alternative traditions than by the strong drive toward national identity and consensus. Cultural anthropologists, critics, and (“documentary”) writers such as “native anthropologist” Zora Neale Hurston, Constance Rourke, or James Agee (with photographer Walker Evans, inLet Us Now Praise Famous Men) worked out radical new methods and strategies of culturalcritiqueand ethnographicwritingin the study of American cultures, in the plural. Thus, historian Caroline F. Ware, writing for the American Historical Association inThe Cultural Approach to History, could argue in 1940 that the “total cultural approach” does by no means imply that American culture is something like an organic unity, but that “American culture”isexactly themultiplicityof regional, ethnic, and class cultures and the interactions of these cultures in terms of rhetoric as well as of power,notsome “common patterns” or the Anglo-Saxon tradition the “other” groups have to “contribute” to.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference177 articles.

1. Process, System, and Symbol: A New Anthropological Synthesis;Turner;Daedalus,1977

2. The Concepts of Culture and of Social System;Kroeber;American Sociological Review,1958

3. Johnson , A World of Difference, p. 2.

4. Bercoviteh Sacvan , The American Jeremiad, ch. 6

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3