A comparative cross-sectional assessment of statistical knowledge of faculty across five health science disciplines

Author:

Hayat Matthew J.ORCID,Schwartz Todd A.,Kim MyoungJin,Ali Syeda Zahra,Jiroutek Michael R.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare statistical knowledge of health science faculty across accredited schools of dentistry, medicine, nursing, pharmacy, and public health. Methods: A probability sample of schools was selected, and all faculty at each selected school were invited to participate in an online statistical knowledge assessment that covered fundamental topics including randomization, study design, statistical power, confidence intervals, multiple testing, standard error, regression outcome, and odds ratio. Results: A total of 708 faculty from 102 schools participated. The overall response rate was 6.5%. Most (94.2%) faculty reported reading the peer-reviewed health-related literature. Respondents answered 66.2% of questions correctly across all questions and disciplines. Public health had the highest performance (80.7%) and dentistry the lowest (53.3%). Conclusions: Knowledge of statistics is essential for critically evaluating evidence and understanding the health literature. These study results identify a gap in knowledge by educators tasked with training the next generation of health science professionals. Recommendations for addressing this gap are provided.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Power, effects, confidence, and significance: An investigation of statistical practices in nursing research

2. An Exploratory Study of Statistical Assessment of Papers Published in the British Medical Journal

3. ISSUES AND STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING THE LENGTH OF SELF-REPORT SCALES

4. Statistics in the Pharmacy Literature

5. 49. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials: core competencies for professional nursing education; [Internet] 2020 [cited June 24, 2021]. (https://www.aacnnursing.org/Portals/42/AcademicNursing/pdf/Essentials-2021.pdf)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3