Relationship between Pattern of Fingerprints and Blood Groups

Author:

Aamir Yasmin,Masood Riffat,Irshad Nasim,Malik Romana,Farid Noreen,Shahab Muhammad Asif

Abstract

Background and Aim: Fingerprints are a unique identification tool useful in the forensic investigation for detection of crimes. The probability of two people having an identical pattern of fingerprints is one in 64,000 million. The ridge pattern of fingerprints developed during fetal period do not change throughout their life until skin decomposes. The pattern of fingerprints differ widely with blood group variation. Therefore, the present study aimed to correlate the pattern of fingerprints with blood groups. Methodology: This prospective study was conducted on 178 medical students (MBBS and BDS) in the Department of Forensic Medicine, District Headquarters Hospital and Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi for the period from November 2021 to April 2022. Prior to study conduction, ethical approval was taken from the institutes research and ethical committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each individual. Participants with known blood groups having age range from 17 to 23 years were enrolled. Ink method was used for taking fingerprints. Patterns of fingerprints were categorized as loops, whirl, arches, and composite. SPSS version 25 was used for data analysis. Results: Of the total 178 medical students, there were 48 (27%) male and 130 (73%) females. The overall mean age was 21.6 ± 1.4 years with an age range from 17 to 23 years. Out of total medical students, the incidence of blood group A, B, AB, and O was 53 (29.8%), 31 (17.4%), 19 (10.7%), and 75 (42.1%) respectively. The prevalence of Rh-positive was 90.4% (n=161) among the studied cases. Loop pattern was the most prevalent fingerprints pattern observed in 95 (53.4%) cases. Majority of loop patterns were seen in blood group O participants. Other fingerprints pattern such as whorls, arches, and composite were found in 49 (27.5%), 24 (13.5%), and 10 (5.6%) respectively. Conclusion: The present study concluded that blood group “O” was the most prevalent group followed by A, B, and AB. Loop was the most common pattern of fingerprints among blood groups especially in blood group O. The prevalence of Rh-positive was found higher among the study cases. Keywords: Pattern, Fingerprints, Blood group.

Publisher

Lahore Medical and Dental College

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Otorhinolaryngology,Sociology and Political Science,History,Philosophy,General Mathematics,General Medicine,Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science,History,Sociology and Political Science,History,Communication,Cultural Studies,Religious studies,History,Biomaterials,Visual Arts and Performing Arts,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3