Comparing Methods of Estimating Fecal-Pellet-Group Density in Woodlots of the Midwestern United States

Author:

Sample Richard D.1,Tomey Rylee D.1,Delisle Zackary J.1,Trumbower Alexis R.1,Habeck Phoebe J.1,Brooke Jarred M.1,Jenkins Michael A.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, College of Agriculture, Purdue University, 715 West State Street, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Abstract

Abstract Fecal-pellet surveys provide density estimates of pellet groups, which offer a quick and reliable index of population densities for white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus and other wildlife species. Comparisons of differing fecal-pellet survey methodologies have previously shown that they vary in the precision. However, researchers made these comparisons outside of the United States in regions with lower white-tailed deer densities. In this study, we compared pellet-group density estimates and precision from line transects, quadrat sampling, and strip transects. At each site, three observers surveyed simultaneously with each being responsible for one method. Like other studies, we found that each method produced similar estimates of pellet-group density, but quadrat sampling produced the most precise estimates. Furthermore, all three methods suggested that the central region of Indiana had both the highest pellet-group density and the highest precision. These results suggest a more homogenous distribution of pellet groups in areas with higher white-tailed deer densities, which may increase the precision of all methods. Our results suggest that quadrat sampling may be the most effective method for estimating pellet-group densities within woodlots of the U.S. Midwest, and that precision may increase in areas with higher white-tailed deer densities. This study not only improves deer management within the Midwest but provides guidelines for other studies to potentially advance the conservation and management of other species.

Publisher

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3