Manual Versus Semiautomated Bioacoustic Analysis Methods of Multiple Vocalizations in Tricolored Blackbird Colonies

Abstract

Abstract Bioacoustic monitoring can reveal aspects of animal behavior because many species vocalize in association with certain behaviors. Despite this, bioacoustics remain infrequently used to monitor animal behavior because of lack of knowledge of how vocalizations relate to behavior and the challenge of efficiently analyzing the large acoustic data sets necessary to capture relevant behaviors. Vocalizations and associated behaviors have been previously established for the colonial tricolored blackbird Agelaius tricolor, but efficient analysis of the acoustic data remains a challenge. Previous work with tricolored blackbird acoustic data relied on manually listening to recordings, which is not practical on large scales. Using software to automatically detect vocalizations of interest has potential to reduce analysis time. However, automated detection is prone to errors often caused by faint vocalizations, overlapping calls, and background noise. Thus, incorporating components of manual and automated analysis of acoustic data sets remains essential. To address these challenges, we deployed autonomous recording units at three tricolored blackbird colonies in California from 2019 to 2021 and analyzed acoustic data using a manual and a semiautomated analysis method. Specifically, we used tricolored blackbird male song, male chorus, female song, hatchling call, nestling call, and fledgling call to determine the approximate timing of breeding stages and number of breeding attempts, or pulses, for each colony. We found that using a semiautomated approach was more time efficient than manual analysis, while using comparable numbers of recordings and obtaining equivalent information from the colonies. The odds of correct detections of vocalizations using the semiautomated method were generally lower for fainter vocalizations and colonies with high background noise. Overall, the semiautomated approach had tolerable rates of recall, precision, false positives, and false negatives. Our methodology adds to a growing body of literature addressing acoustic analyses, especially for colonial species and where questions of breeding phenology are important.