Affiliation:
1. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı
2. ANKARA MEDİPOL UNIVERSITY
3. HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
In recent years, there have been significant efforts by Turkish researchers to contribute to the knowledge production to the field of educational administration like the scholarly endeavor of their international peers. The main purpose of these scientific studies including dissertations is to contribute to the production of knowledge, and to offer original alternatives to solving problems through several philosophical approaches. Consistent with this effort, the present study aims to evaluate the dissertations produced in the field of educational administration epistemologically, and ontologically in respect of Habermas' knowledge taxonomy. The research was carried out using document, and discourse analysis, which are qualitative research methods, and 215 dissertations prepared in 23 different universities accessed from Council of Higher Education Thesis Center database were analyzed. Results show that Eskisehir Osmangazi, Hacettepe, and Ankara Universities take the lead in the production of dissertations. It was found the number of males was higher in both researcher, and supervisor positions, mainly quantitative research methods are used, and empirical-analytical knowledge is produced. The limitation of historical-hermeneutical/interpretative, and critically oriented knowledge types is another original finding. The data set included only dissertations and excluded other sources from Turkey. Authors believe this study serve as a base for better understanding the current features of the field. In addition, this study, which was conducted in a non-western country, is expected to affect the knowledge production trend in the field of educational administration, and support the diversity of knowledge in dissertations, which are detailed studies shed light to the future.
Publisher
Egitim Yoneticileri ve Egitim Denetcileri Dernegi
Reference77 articles.
1. Aksu, M. (2020). Egitim yonetimi alaninda teori-uygulama boslugu (637769) [Dissertation, Eskisehir Osmangazi University]. CoHETC.
2. Archbald, D. (2008). Research versus problem solving for the education leadership doctoral thesis: Implications for form, and function. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 704–739.
3. Aydin, A., & Uysal, S. (2014). Turkiye‘de egitim yonetimi teftisi planlamasi ve ekonomisi alanindaki doktora tezlerinin incelenmesi. Abant Izzet Baysal Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 14(1), 177-201.
4. Ayyildiz, P. (2019). Egitim yonetimi ogretim elemanlarinin alanin bilgisine dair epistemik inanclari (565399) [Dissertation, Hacettepe University]. CoHETC.
5. Balci, A. (2008). Turkiye’de egitim yonetiminin bilimlesme duzeyi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, 54, 181–209.