Service user experiences of community services for complex emotional needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis

Author:

Sheridan Rains LukeORCID,Echave Athena,Rees Jessica,Scott Hannah Rachel,Lever Taylor Billie,Broeckelmann Eva,Steare Thomas,Barnett PhoebeORCID,Cooper Chris,Jeynes Tamar,Russell Jessica,Oram Sian,Rowe Sarah,Johnson Sonia

Abstract

Background There is a recognised need to develop clear service models and pathways to provide high quality care in the community for people with complex emotional needs, who may have been given a “personality disorder” diagnosis. Services should be informed by the views of people with these experiences. Aims To identify and synthesise qualitative studies on service user experiences of community mental health care for Complex Emotional Needs. Methods We searched six bibliographic databases for papers published since 2003. We included peer reviewed studies reporting data on service user experiences and views about good care from community-based mental health services for adults with CEN, including generic mental health services and specialist “personality disorder” services. Studies using any qualitative method were included and thematic synthesis used to identify over-arching themes. Results Forty-seven papers were included. Main themes were: 1) The need for a long-term perspective on treatment journeys; 2) The need for individualised and holistic care; 3) Large variations in accessibility and quality of mental health services; 4) The centrality of therapeutic relationships; 5) Impacts of ‘personality disorder’ diagnosis. Themes tended to recur across studies from different countries and years. Discussion Recurrent major themes included wanting support that is individualised and holistic, provides continuity over long journeys towards recovery, and that is delivered by empathetic and well-informed clinicians who are hopeful but realistic about the prospects of treatment. Care that met these simple and clearly stated priorities tended to be restricted to often limited periods of treatment by specialist “personality disorder” services: generic and primary care services were often reported as far from adequate. There is an urgent need to co-design and test strategies for improving long-term support and treatment care for people with “personality disorders” throughout the mental health care system.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Policy Research Programme

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference79 articles.

1. Personality disorder prevalence in psychiatric outpatients: A systematic literature review.;H Beckwith;Personal Ment Health,2014

2. Personality disorder services in England: findings from a national survey.;O Dale;BJPsych Bull,2017

3. Personality disorder service provision: a review of the recent literature;S Evans;Mental Health Review Journal,2017

4. Borderline Personality Disorder: To diagnose or not to diagnose? That is the question;K Campbell;International Journal of Mental Health Nursing,2020

5. Stigma perpetuation at the interface of mental health care: a review to compare patient and clinician perspectives of stigma and borderline personality disorder.;D Ring;J Ment Health. 2019 Mar,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3