Exploring the gender gap in the Spanish Wikipedia: Differences in engagement and editing practices

Author:

Minguillón JuliàORCID,Meneses JulioORCID,Aibar EduardORCID,Ferran-Ferrer Núria,Fàbregues Sergi

Abstract

Wikipedia’s significant gender bias is widely acknowledged. In this paper we analyze the Spanish Wikipedia with the aim of estimating the percentage of women editors and measuring their engagement and editing practices with respect to their men counterparts. To identify the gender of Wikipedia registered users, we analyzed both the information contained in their user profile and the information provided by users about themselves on their personal user pages. Using our own coding procedure, it is possible to identify a greater number of women than by relying only on the gender reported in their user profile. Combining both methods, our results show that the percentage of women is small, a meagre 11.6% of all analyzed editors, though there is still a significant percentage of users whose gender cannot be determined by either method. Men outnumber women in all Wikipedia namespaces in a ratio that is always equal to or greater than 3:1. This fact can be partially explained by the lesser persistence of women editors, who tend to leave Wikipedia much more quickly. There is, however, a small group of veteran women editors who, in some cases, surpass men editors in terms of their editing practices and participation in different Wikipedia namespaces.

Funder

Fundació la Caixa

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference49 articles.

1. Wikimedia Vision [April 9, 2020]. Available from: https://wikimediafoundation.org/about/vision/.

2. Miquel-Ribé M, Laniado D. Wikipedia cultural diversity dataset: A complete cartography for 300 language editions. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web and Social Media, ICWSM; 2019. p. 620–9.

3. List of Wikipedias 2019 [March 24, 2019]. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Wikipedias&oldid=886713365.

4. Aibar E. Wikipedia, academia, and science. Proceedings of the Workshop Wikipedia, a Social Pedia: Research Challenges and Opportunities; 2015. p. 2–5.

5. Bridging the gap between wikipedia and academia;D Jemielniak;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology,2016

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3