Abstract
Curiosity-driven, basic biological research “…performed without thought of practical ends…” establishes fundamental conceptual frameworks for future technological and medical breakthroughs. Traditionally, curiosity-driven research in biological sciences has utilized experimental organisms chosen for their tractability and suitability for studying the question of interest. This approach leverages the diversity of life to uncover working solutions (adaptations) to problems encountered by living things, and evolutionary context as to the extent to which these solutions may be generalized to other species. Despite the well-documented success of this approach, funding portfolios of United States granting agencies are increasingly filled with studies on a few species for which cutting-edge molecular tools are available (genetic model organisms). While this narrow focus may be justified for biomedically-focused funding bodies such as the National Institutes of Health, it is critical that robust federal support for curiosity-driven research using diverse experimental organisms be maintained by agencies such as the National Science Foundation. Using the disciplines of neurobiology and behavioral research as an example, this study finds that NSF grant awards have declined in association with a decrease in the proportion of grants funded for experimental, rather than genetic model organism research. The decline in use of experimental organisms in the literature mirrors but predates the shift grant funding. Today’s dominance of genetic model organisms was thus initiated by researchers themselves and/or by publication peer review and editorial preferences, and was further reinforced by pressure from granting agencies, academic employers, and the scientific community.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference101 articles.
1. Bush V. Science the endless frontier. Washington: United States Government Printing Office. 1945. https://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm
2. 81st United States Congress. National Science Foundation Act of 1950. 1950. https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/legislation.pdf
3. Mazuzan GT. The National Science Foundation: a brief history. 1994. https://www.nsf.gov/about/history/nsf50/nsf8816.jsp
4. Driving drug discovery: the fundamental role of academic labs;BM Silber;Sci Transl Med,2010
5. Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. When is a brain organoid a sentience candidate?;Molecular Psychology: Brain, Behavior, and Society;2024-08-20
2. Stepping Back;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15
3. Large Language Models and the Gaming Problem;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15
4. Frontiers of Proportionality;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15
5. Pushing the Boundaries;The Edge of Sentience;2024-08-15