Abstract
Relational aspects, such as involvement of donor’s relatives or friends in the decision-making on participation in a research biobank, providing relatives’ health data to researchers, or sharing research findings with relatives should be considered when reflecting on ethical aspects of research biobanks. The aim of this paper is to explore what the role of donor’s relatives and friends is in the process of becoming and being a biobank donor and which ethical issues arise in this context. We performed qualitative analysis of 40 qualitative semi-structured interviews with biobank donors and researchers. The results show that relatedness to relatives or other types of close relationships played a significant role in the donors’ motivation to be involved in a biobank, risk-benefit assessment, and decisions on sharing information on research and its results. Interviewees mentioned ethical issues in the context of sharing relatives’ health-related data for research purposes and returning research findings that may affect their relatives. We conclude that the question of what information on family members may be shared with a biobank by research participants without informed consent of those relatives, and when family members become research subjects, lacks a clear answer and detailed guidelines, especially in the context of the introduction of the European Union’s (EU) General Data Protection Regulation. Researchers in Latvia and EU face ethical questions and dilemmas about returning research results and incidental findings to donors’ relatives, and donors need more information on sharing research results with relatives in the informed consent process.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference22 articles.
1. WMA. Declaration of Taipei on Ethical Considerations regarding Health Databases and Biobanks. 2016. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-taipei-on-ethical-considerations-regarding-health-databases-and-biobanks/.
2. Tissue donation to biobanks: a review of sociological studies;W Lipworth;Sociol Health Illn,2011
3. Biosamples as gifts? How participants in biobanking projects talk about donation;L Locock;Health Expect,2016
4. Relational Autonomy, Liberal Individualism, and the Social Constitution of Selves;J Christman;Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition,2004
5. CIOMS. International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences; 2016 [16.08.2020]. Available from: https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WEB-CIOMS-EthicalGuidelines.pdf.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Latvia;GDPR Requirements for Biobanking Activities Across Europe;2023