Abstract
Purpose
This study investigated the influence of patient-centeredness on patient safety perception among inpatients, with particular focus on the relationships between subfactors of patient-centeredness and patient safety perception.
Methods
Data were collected from 122 inpatients in a university hospital from September 24 to October 8, 2019. Patient-centeredness was evaluated using the Patient-Centeredness Assessment Scale; patient safety perception was evaluated using the Korean version of the Patient Safety Perception Scale. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted using SPSS for Windows 24.0.
Results
Average patient-centeredness score among inpatients was 77.14 ± 12.64 (range 0–100), and average patient safety perception score was 99.24 ± 15.90 (range 24–120). Patient-centeredness influenced patient safety perception (R2 = 70%, F = 27.75, p < .001). With respect to subfactors of patient safety perception, the medical team’s activities to ensure safety was affected by the general treatment process and overall evaluation of patient-centeredness (R2 = 54%, F = 13.14, p < .001); patient safety practice was influenced only by the general treatment process (R2 = 39%, F = 7.02, p < .001); and trust in the medical system was affected by nurses’ service, the general treatment process, and the hospital environment (R2 = 44%, F = 8.49, p < .001).
Conclusions
To enhance patient safety perception, strategies should seek to strengthen patient-centeredness and its related subfactors, particularly the general treatment process, the hospital environment, and nurses’ service.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference37 articles.
1. Institute of Medicine Report: crossing the quality chasm: a new health care system for the 21st century;A Wolfe;Policy Polit Nurs Pract,2001
2. Do Y, Kim J, Lee J, Lee H, Cho M. Study on the development of patient-centered evaluation model. Seoul: Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA), 2015. Available from: http://www.snu-dhpm.ac.kr/pds/article.html?code=report1&number=2407
3. World Health Organization. The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance: World Health Organization; 2000.
4. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press. 2001.
5. A conceptual framework for the OECD health care quality indicators project;OA Arah;Int J Qual Health Care,2006
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献