Abstract
While most countries imposed a lockdown in response to the first wave of COVID-19 infections, Sweden did not. To quantify the lockdown effect, we approximate a counterfactual lockdown scenario for Sweden through the outcome in a synthetic control unit. We find, first, that a 9-week lockdown in the first half of 2020 would have reduced infections and deaths by about 75% and 38%, respectively. Second, the lockdown effect starts to materialize with a delay of 3–4 weeks only. Third, the actual adjustment of mobility patterns in Sweden suggests there has been substantial voluntary social restraint, although the adjustment was less strong than under the lockdown scenario. Lastly, we find that a lockdown would not have caused much additional output loss.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference31 articles.
1. Economic and social consequences of human mobility restrictions under COVID-19;G Bonaccorsi;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2020
2. Frey BS, Osterloh M. Was sagt die Glücksforschung zu Corona?; 2020. Die Volkswirtschaft 6/2020.
3. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics;WO Kermack;Procceedings of the Royal Society,1927
4. Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19;R Zhanga;PNAS,2020
5. Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe;S Flaxman;Nature,2020
Cited by
68 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献