Abstract
This paper examines intersectoral water allocation, in particular how cities secure water vis-à-vis rural users, and assesses the equity of this (re)allocation. We use the distribution theory of institutional change, and argue that urban water providers mobilize power resources (positional, financial and informational) to secure water. We adapt the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework to study this empirically, with case studies from India, Spain and the United States that centre around a large reservoir and its reoperation. Results show the importance of financing power in all cases, and also suggest that cities may lack the positional power needed to implement drinking water priorities. The ‘hybrid equity approach’ reveals the diversity of equity considerations on rural-to-urban water reallocation, both in terms of local perspectives and also regarding universal equity principles. Finally, it is fruitful to study power and equity together, as the former generally has profound distributional and procedural implications which are at the heart of equity.
Funder
Fondation Ernst et Lucie Schmidheiny
UNESCO Chair on Hydropolitics
Environmental Governance and Territorial Development Department, University of Geneva
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference57 articles.
1. Urban water security: A review;A.Y. Hoekstra;Environmental research letters,2018
2. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Revision of World Urbanization Prospects; 2018.
3. Rural water for thirsty cities: A systematic review of water reallocation from rural to urban regions;D. Garrick;Environmental Research Letters,2019
4. Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability;R. I. McDonald;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2011
5. Re-politicising water governance: exploring water re-allocations in terms of justice;K. J. Joy;Local Environment,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献