Abstract
In this proof-of-concept work, we evaluate the performance of multiple machine-learning methods as surrogate models for use in the analysis of agent-based models (ABMs). Analysing agent-based modelling outputs can be challenging, as the relationships between input parameters can be non-linear or even chaotic even in relatively simple models, and each model run can require significant CPU time. Surrogate modelling, in which a statistical model of the ABM is constructed to facilitate detailed model analyses, has been proposed as an alternative to computationally costly Monte Carlo methods. Here we compare multiple machine-learning methods for ABM surrogate modelling in order to determine the approaches best suited as a surrogate for modelling the complex behaviour of ABMs. Our results suggest that, in most scenarios, artificial neural networks (ANNs) and gradient-boosted trees outperform Gaussian process surrogates, currently the most commonly used method for the surrogate modelling of complex computational models. ANNs produced the most accurate model replications in scenarios with high numbers of model runs, although training times were longer than the other methods. We propose that agent-based modelling would benefit from using machine-learning methods for surrogate modelling, as this can facilitate more robust sensitivity analyses for the models while also reducing CPU time consumption when calibrating and analysing the simulation.
Funder
UKRI Research England
Children’s Liver Disease Foundation
UK Prevention Research Partnership
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference60 articles.
1. Agent-based models;S De Marchi;Annual Review of political science,2014
2. Empirically based, agent-based models;MA Janssen;Ecology and society,2006
3. Why we need a complex systems model of evidence for public health;H Rutter;The Lancet,2017
4. Silverman E, Gostoli U, Picascia S, Almagor J, McCann M, Shaw R, et al. Situating Agent-Based Modelling in Population Health Research; 2020.
5. Dynamic models of segregation;TC Schelling;Journal of Mathematical Sociology,1971
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献