Researchers’ perspective of real-world impact from UK public health research: A qualitative study

Author:

Lakin KayORCID,Meadmore KatieORCID,Recio Saucedo Alejandra,Baker GenevieveORCID,Worswick Louise,Thomas SarahORCID

Abstract

Research funded by the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research Programme is being undertaken in a complex system which brings opportunities and challenges for researchers to maximise the impact of their research. This study seeks to better understand the facilitators, challenges and barriers to research impact and knowledge mobilisation from the perspective of UK public health researchers. A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews, informed by the Payback Framework, with public health researchers who held a research award with the National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research programme up to March 2017 was conducted. Following a thematic analysis, three strongly interlinked themes were extracted from the data and three key factors were highlighted as important for facilitating knowledge mobilisation and impact in UK public health research: (1) Public health researcher’s perception of the purpose of the research (2) Approaches to undertaking Knowledge mobilisation activities (3) The complex nature of public health research in the wider research context. These have been reflected onto the Payback framework. Public health researchers can maximise the likelihood for impact by being aware of the context in which they are undertaking research, using different methods, and employing several strategies to take advantage of opportunities. There is a need to support researchers with knowledge mobilisation activities and for funders to identify their expectations of the impact resulting from research. Our findings have relevance to public health researchers and funders interested in increasing the benefit that research brings to society.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference38 articles.

1. National Institute for Health Research [Internet] UK. [cited 2019 April 03]. What we do. Available from: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/about-us/what-we-do.

2. Mapping public health research across the National Institute for Health Research 2006–2013;EW Guegan;BMC Public Health,2016

3. Elsevier. International comparative performance of the UK research base 2016: A report prepared for the UK’s Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) [Internet]. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (UK); 2017 Oct [cited 2019 April 03]. Sponsored and funded by Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/performance-of-the-uk-research-base-international-comparison-2016

4. Promoting an open research culture;BA Nosek;Science,2015

5. Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment programme;J Raftery;Health Technol Assess,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3