Assessing women’s preferences towards tests that may reveal uncertain results from prenatal genomic testing: Development of attributes for a discrete choice experiment, using a mixed-methods design

Author:

Hammond Jennifer,Klapwijk Jasmijn E.ORCID,Riedijk Sam,Lou Stina,Ormond Kelly E.ORCID,Vogel Ida,Hui Lisa,Sziepe Emma-Jane,Buchanan James,Ingvoldstad-Malmgren Charlotta,Soller Maria Johansson,Harding Eleanor,Hill Melissa,Lewis CelineORCID

Abstract

Prenatal DNA tests, such as chromosomal microarray analysis or exome sequencing, increase the likelihood of receiving a diagnosis when fetal structural anomalies are identified. However, some parents will receive uncertain results such as variants of uncertain significance and secondary findings. We aimed to develop a set of attributes and associated levels for a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) that will examine parents’ preferences for tests that may reveal uncertain test results. A two phase mixed-methods approach was used to develop attributes for the DCE. In Phase 1, a “long list” of candidate attributes were identified via two approaches: 1) a systematic review of the literature around parental experiences of uncertainty following prenatal testing; 2) 16 semi-structured interviews with parents who had experienced uncertainty during pregnancy and 25 health professionals who return uncertain prenatal results. In Phase 2, a quantitative scoring exercise with parents prioritised the candidate attributes. Clinically appropriate levels for each attribute were then developed. A final set of five attributes and levels were identified: likelihood of getting a result, reporting of variants of uncertain significance, reporting of secondary findings, time taken to receive results, and who tells you about your result. These attributes will be used in an international DCE study to investigate preferences and differences across countries. This research will inform best practice for professionals supporting parents to manage uncertainty in the prenatal setting.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference50 articles.

1. Risk of major congenital malformations in relation to maternal overweight and obesity severity: cohort study of 1.2 million singletons;M Persson;Bmj,2017

2. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis;RJ Wapner;The New England journal of medicine,2012

3. Promises, pitfalls and practicalities of prenatal whole exome sequencing;S Best;Prenatal diagnosis,2018

4. Prenatal exome sequencing analysis in fetal structural anomalies detected by ultrasonography (PAGE): a cohort study;J Lord;Lancet,2019

5. Whole-exome sequencing in the evaluation of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective cohort study;S Petrovski;Lancet,2019

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3